Statistics
Descriptive statistics
In French: Statistiques descriptives
Descriptive statistics summarise a data set with a few numbers: where it sits, how much it spreads, and what shape it has. It is the step that precedes any analysis, and the one most often skipped.
Location, spread, shape
Location says where the centre is. The mean is the best known and the most fragile: a single extreme value shifts it. The median, the value that cuts the sample in two, does not move — which is why salaries are given as a median and not a mean.
Spread says how far the values depart from that centre. The range, the difference between the maximum and the minimum, can be worked out in your head but retains only two points. The standard deviation measures the typical deviation of the whole set, and it is what feeds all the rest of Six Sigma — capability, control charts, tests.
Shape says how the values are distributed around the centre: symmetrical or skewed to one side, tight or spread out, with a single peak or several. Two peaks in a histogram are one of the most useful signals in Lean Six Sigma: they almost always betray two mixed populations — two machines, two shifts, two suppliers.
Look before calculating
A histogram, a box plot or a simple scatter of points in chronological order teach more than three indicators. Data sets with identical means and standard deviations can look radically different; only the chart tells them apart.
Chronological order deserves a separate mention. Arranging the measurements in production order reveals drifts, jumps and cycles that any numerical summary erases — and a slow drift is exactly the kind of problem one never finds by looking at a monthly average.
Sample and population
One almost always measures a sample, and wants to conclude about the population. That passage is never free: two samples drawn from the same process will give two different means, and the gap between them is nothing abnormal.
Hence the caution to keep in front of two figures that differ: before seeing an effect, one has to know by how much they would have differed without anything happening. Comparing two means by eye leads to launching projects on noise — statistical tests exist precisely to settle that point.
The two quantities to know
Mean x̄ = (sum of the values) / n
Standard deviation (sample) s = √[ Σ(xi − x̄)² / (n − 1) ]
The denominator n − 1, not n, is Bessel’s correction: on a sample, dividing by n systematically underestimates the real spread. Spreadsheets offer both functions and do not warn you which one you took.
The common mistakes
Giving a mean without its spread. "The average lead time is 8 days" does not say whether every file comes out in 8 days or whether half come out in 2 and the other half in 14. Those are two completely different processes, and only one of them has a consistency problem.
Discarding an extreme value because it is inconvenient. An outlier is information: it signals either an entry error, or a real event that must be understood. Removing it without having explained it amounts to erasing the only clue available.
On the shop floor — Food processing
A histogram of packaging weights showed two clear peaks. The workshop suspected an unstable setting; sorting by line showed two machines centred differently, each of them consistent. The problem was not variability but a set-point offset, corrected in half a day.
The other tools illustrated by this trade: food and beverage.
An article that covers it
Frequently asked questions
Should the mean or the median be used?
The median as soon as the distribution is asymmetric or carries extreme values — lead times, costs, waiting times. The mean when the distribution is roughly symmetrical, which is frequent for physical measurements. When in doubt, give both: the gap between them is itself information about the shape of the distribution.
Why divide by n − 1 for the standard deviation?
Because the spread of a population is being estimated from a sample whose data has already been used to calculate the mean. Dividing by n would give a systematically too small value. The correction becomes negligible on large samples, and counts a great deal below about thirty values.
How many measurements are needed to describe a process?
About thirty already make it possible to see the shape of a distribution and estimate a spread correctly. Below about ten, a histogram shows nothing reliable. But the number matters less than the manner: thirty measurements taken in the same hour on the same machine describe that hour, not the process.
What is the difference between standard deviation and range?
The range retains only the largest and the smallest value; the standard deviation takes all of them into account. The range remains in use on small samples — mean-and-range control charts live on it — because it can be calculated without a tool, but it becomes misleading as soon as the sample grows.
See also
Practise this topic
The Six Sigma Green Belt track has questions on this subject. It is part of full access.
See the track